Defending the wilderness, sacrificing the refugees of Nazi Germany

Again in 1999, when I reported the story of a number of rural Jewish households who tried to flee Nazi Germany to Alaska, it appeared a lesson for the longer term.

The Alaska refugee plan, the one geographic rescue proposal generated in America earlier than the struggle, ran right into a wall of selfishness, nativism, and antisemitism. The proposal died. As a substitute of crusing west to America, the Rosenthals and Lilienfelds and their kids had been taken from their small city in 1941 and shipped on trains to Riga, Theresienstadt and Auschwitz.

Greater than prejudice had been at work in Alaska, in fact. Many sensible and political arguments had been raised towards creating an exception to immigration quotas for the Alaska territory. Staff and small companies feared competitors from hundreds of sponsored newcomers. Refugees, stripped of any wealth by the Nazis, would require pricey new welfare packages and amenities. Miners particularly feared new taxes to pay for all of it. And making a back-door “exception” to America’s strict quotas would make a digital internment camp of the territory, with residents pressured to undergo screening as they acquired off steamships in Seattle.

All of that sounds pathetic, wanting again, understanding the bottomless depravity of the Nazis — small sacrifices, trifling excuses for not cracking the door open, even a little bit. However historic judgments are tough.

Watching the new Ken Burns series about the U.S. response to the Holocaust on PBS this month, one uniquely Alaskan argument from these pre-war occasions gnawed at me, forcing me to query how a lot I’d have been prepared to sacrifice.

I couldn’t neglect the 1940 rebuttal to the resettlement plan printed in a nationwide journal by a literary hero of mine: Bob Marshall, founding father of The Wilderness Society and son of the past-president of the American Jewish Committee.

A rich Easterner who served as an influential authorities forester within the Thirties beneath Franklin D. Roosevelt, Marshall traveled north 12 months after 12 months to tramp and dwell tough within the Brooks Vary. When buddies and I backpacked by the Brooks Vary within the Seventies, his e-book “Alaska Wilderness” was just about the one written “information” we might discover.

[SANCTUARY: Alaska and the Holocaust]

Much more vital to me was the instance of his 1933 nationwide bestseller, “Arctic Village,” an in depth account of a winter he spent within the settlement of Wiseman, “2 hundred miles past the sting of the Twentieth Century.” Marshall portrays with twinkling admiration the individuals and existence of that distant group, white and Native. The e-book is on a brief checklist of Alaska classics and influenced my own recent book concerning the ghost city a long time of McCarthy-Kennecott.

Marshall performed an energetic and infrequently controversial position in Alaska public coverage in the course of the Melancholy, talking up for wilderness preservation in Washington, D.C. He hoped a slower tempo of northern growth would perpetuate “the potential for exploration” and the pioneer individualism he admired in his Wiseman neighbors.

Marshall was within the social advantages of wilderness greater than nature for nature’s sake. Requested in a congressional listening to how a lot wilderness the nation wanted, the millionaire socialist responded, “What number of Brahms symphonies do we’d like?”

He as soon as made a far-fetched proposal to limit federal leasing and road-building north of the Yukon River, which might have precluded the later oil discover at Prudhoe Bay. But his survival abilities and good nature earned the friendship of Chuck Herbert, the mining engineer who later helped choose the state’s oil-rich Arctic lands. The North Slope Inupiat may need thought of his Yukon River line to be extra colonialist vanity. But Marshall’s writing refuted racial stereotypes of his day, emphasizing to a nationwide viewers the wit and superior intelligence of his Eskimo buddies in Wiseman.

There have been different causes to count on compassionate concern for the state of affairs unfolding in Europe. His grandparents, on each side, had been descended from German Jewish refugees. His father, Louis Marshall, was a famed constitutional scholar and civil rights activist.

Louis Marshall additionally fought to guard wilderness in New York’s Adirondack State Park, and it was there that antisemitism had smacked the household. Bob and his brother had been each famous climbers, and an effort to call an Adirondack peak after them was shot down by an Japanese legal professional who declared his personal “pro-Gentile bias” and accused the Marshalls of adjusting their identify’s spelling to disguise their “Hebrew” origins. In accordance with his biographer, Bob Marshall shrugged off the controversy, agreeing that mountains shouldn’t be named after residing individuals.

Discovering secure haven for persecuted and homeless Jews was a much more severe matter. But when the Alaska resettlement plan was proposed — first in 1939 within the Inside Division’s “Slattery Report,” then in 1940 within the King-Havenner invoice in Congress — Bob Marshall’s response was to oppose it, mounting as an alternative a protection of the wilderness lifestyle in The New Republic.

Marshall’s piece didn’t point out Jewish refugees in any respect. He didn’t must: Drafters of the Slattery Report had been so evasive concerning the plan’s true intention that they talked about Jews solely as soon as in 70-plus pages, touting as an alternative a program open to refugees and residents each.

The idealists at Inside, advocating for Jewish resettlement, had pitched their plan to Alaska boomers and builders, calculating that enterprise leaders could be detest to refute acquainted bromides about frontier progress. Solely a conservationist like Marshall would take these on.

A authorities program to populate Alaska, he argued, would finally run afoul of the identical issues of distance and markets that had lengthy annoyed growth within the north. Like all such booms, it could at finest carry transient prosperity for a number of. Within the course of it could threaten the open land, ample wildlife, scope for individualism, and “frontier environment” that added as much as Alaska’s nice attraction.

Some opponents of the plan veered as an alternative into barely disguised antisemitism. Headlines in Alaska newspapers proclaimed “”Alaska Wants No Misfits” and “Jews for Alaska?” The president of the Anchorage Chamber of Commerce stated such newcomers could be exhausting to assimilate: Simply have a look at how that they had introduced hassle on themselves in Germany.

Given time, as issues in Germany grew worse and worse, Bob Marshall’s priorities may need shifted. However he was not given time.

By January 1940, when his New Republic article appeared, Marshall was lifeless, felled two months earlier by an obvious coronary heart assault whereas driving on a practice to New York from Washington, D.C. He was 38. Solely that summer time, he had been within the Brooks Vary, fortunately thrashing his method up the North Fork of the Koyukuk.

Immediately, the longer term I imagined once I wrote that unhappy story again in 1999 is already upon us. The planet is shrinking and limitations to immigration are rising in all places.

It does really feel like we have now been moved by that lesson of historical past. A brand new tide of refugees is on its option to Alaska, a few of whom want no assist: the monied vanguard fleeing the drought-stricken American West to purchase second properties with a view of the ocean. I don’t count on to see headlines proclaiming “Alaska Needs No Millionaires.” We have now opened the sanctuary door to others, nevertheless — to households who fled Afghanistan and Ukraine, Sudan and Somalia, migrants now residing in Anchorage and elsewhere across the state.

However there are 27 million refugees fleeing battle and persecution on the earth in the present day, in accordance with the UN refugee company. Much more are on the transfer due to starvation and poverty. As rising warmth swells their numbers, some will look north and see horizons of empty land. This summer time, a Time Journal author imagined simply such a state of affairs over the following 75 years, with new cities in Alaska constructed to deal with tens of millions of migrants from the tropics, bringing“huge alternatives for growth within the New North.”

When wilderness and compassion conflict this time, the place will we draw the road?

Homer author Tom Kizzia was a longtime reporter for the Anchorage Every day Information. He’s writer of the books “Pilgrim’s Wilderness” and “The Wake of the Unseen Object.” His newest e-book is “Chilly Mountain Path,” printed in 2021. Attain him at tkizzia@gmail.com

The views expressed listed here are the author’s and will not be essentially endorsed by the Anchorage Every day Information, which welcomes a broad vary of viewpoints. To submit a bit for consideration, e-mail commentary(at)adn.com. Ship submissions shorter than 200 phrases to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Learn our full tips for letters and commentaries here.